Court of Justice of the EU · 27 June 2018
Diallo — C-246/17
A decision on a residence card for a family member of an EU citizen must be made and notified within six months. Expiry of that period does not automatically result in a residence card.
Why does it matter?The judgment emphasises timely decision-making and effective legal protection in EU residence procedures.
View the official judgmentCourt of Justice of the EU · 10 May 2017
Chavez-Vilchez — C-133/15
Where a third-country parent cares for a minor EU citizen, the child’s dependency on that parent must be assessed specifically. Merely referring to the other EU parent is insufficient.
Why does it matter?The child’s best interests, daily care and emotional ties must genuinely be considered under Article 20 TFEU.
View the official judgmentCourt of Justice of the EU · 25 July 2008
Metock — C-127/08
The non-EU spouse of a mobile EU citizen need not have previously resided lawfully in another Member State to benefit from the Citizens’ Rights Directive.
Why does it matter?The judgment protects the family life of mobile EU citizens and limits additional national entry conditions.
View the official judgmentCourt of Justice of the EU · 12 March 2014
O. & B. — C-456/12
An EU citizen who genuinely resided in another Member State and created or strengthened family life there may, under conditions, invoke a derived right of residence upon returning home.
Why does it matter?This judgment guides return-route cases; short visits and holidays are not sufficient.
View the official judgmentCourt of Justice of the EU · 14 November 2017
Lounes — C-165/16
An EU citizen who acquires the nationality of the host state while retaining the original EU nationality may retain Treaty-based rights for a third-country family member.
Why does it matter?Naturalisation need not extinguish previously exercised free-movement rights and related family life.
View the official judgment